Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

Number of tests

1

2

1

Best position

#13

#3

#6

Average position

13.0

3.0

6.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

15

23

32

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

49%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

Wet Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Wet Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Wet Circle Cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Aquaplaning Cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Dry Performance

82%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

Dry Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Snow Performance

68%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

Snow Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Snow Traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Snow Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Ice Performance

86%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

Ice Braking Abs

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Ice Lateral Guidance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Comfort & Noise

66%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

Noise Exterior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Noise Interior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Economy

90%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

Fuel Efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01

ACTIVAN WINTER

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison