18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Linglong Sport MasterBudget
LinglongLinglong

Sport Master

7.1
R16 – R22
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Sport Master
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
8
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
9.5
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
113
60

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Sport Master
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Sport Master
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Sport Master
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Sport Master
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Sport Master
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Sport Master
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison