18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Sport Master
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
8
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
9.5
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
113
40

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Linglong Sport Master
39%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Sport Master
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Sport Master
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Sport Master
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Sport Master
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Sport Master
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Sport Master
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Sport Master
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison