18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Linglong Sport Master

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Linglong (48%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Linglong
Sport Master
Number of tests
1
8
Best position
#13
#1
Average position
13.0
9.5
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
113

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Linglong Sport Master
72%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Linglong Sport Master
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Linglong Sport Master
59%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Linglong Sport Master
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Linglong Sport Master
57%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master
64%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Linglong Sport Master
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Linglong Sport Master
83%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master
61%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Linglong Sport Master
53%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison