Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Pilot Sport 4 S

9.7

R18 – R23

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta PS71

Pilot Sport 4 S

Number of tests

1

15

10

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

9.0

2.1

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

225

195

Wet

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Dry driving behavior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta PS71

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison