18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
15
Best position
#13
#2
Average position
13.0
9.0
Latest test
2019
2025
Available sizes
15
225

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison