Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Primacy 4+

7.6

R16 – R21

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Primacy 4+

Number of tests

1

10

13

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

6.0

4.3

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

104

123

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Interior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Primacy 4+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison