18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
10
15
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
6.0
9.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
104
225

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison