Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

Number of tests

1

10

3

33

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

6.0

3.3

4.1

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

104

40

658

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

29%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Dry driving behavior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Interior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Fuel efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison