18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
10
6
18
Best position
#13
#2
#3
#1
Average position
13.0
6.0
4.7
6.1
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
2024
Available sizes
15
104
146
47

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison