Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

1

10

6

Best position

#13

#2

#3

Average position

13.0

6.0

4.7

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

15

104

146

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison