18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
10
33
Best position
#13
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
6.0
4.1
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
104
658

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison