18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
1
10
13
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
6.0
6.2
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
104
225

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison