18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
10
Best position
#13
#2
Average position
13.0
6.0
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
104

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison