18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Kleber Dynaxer HP4Upper-middle
KleberKleber

Dynaxer HP4

7.2
R14 – R17
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
11
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
11.6
3.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
Available sizes
15
121
34

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison