18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Number of tests
1
13
Best position
#13
#2
Average position
13.0
6.2
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
530

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison