Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

9.5

R16 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Number of tests

1

3

14

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

3.3

3.4

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

15

60

70

Wet

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

82%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

88%

Dry

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

87%

Comfort

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

73%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

68%

Costs

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

87%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison