18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
3
15
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
60
225

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison