18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
3
3
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
60
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison