18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
1
13
18
Best position
#13
#1
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
4.3
6.1
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2024
Available sizes
15
64
123
47

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison