Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

Primacy 4+

7.6

R16 – R21

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

ION Evo

Primacy 4+

Number of tests

1

13

Best position

#13

#1

Average position

13.0

1.0

4.3

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

64

123

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

ACTIVAN WINTER

ION Evo

Primacy 4+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison