18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
1
15
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
64
225

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison