Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Hankook

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Primacy 5

Number of tests

1

5

3

Best position

#13

#1

Average position

13.0

1.0

2.2

4.7

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

Available sizes

15

64

63

126

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 5

ACTIVAN WINTER

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Primacy 5

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison