18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Number of tests
1
1
5
13
Best position
#13
#1
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
2.2
4.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
64
63
123

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison