18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
1
3
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
64
34
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison