18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
64
34

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison