18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
1
3
2
3
Best position
#13
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
3.3
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
40
23
126

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison