18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
1
3
23
Best position
#13
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
40
188

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison