18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
5
15
1
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
2.2
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
63
225
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison