18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
5
15
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
2.2
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
63
225
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison