18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
1
5
23
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
63
188

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison