Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Efficient Grip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

18

24

3

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

6.1

2.7

3.7

Latest test

2019

2024

2025

Available sizes

15

47

151

36

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Tyres for EV cars Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

VS

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Also compare

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Kumho PorTran CW51

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Efficient Grip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison