18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
18
10
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
6.1
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
47
104
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison