18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Number of tests
1
18
13
Best position
#13
#1
#4
Average position
13.0
6.1
6.3
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
Available sizes
15
47
111

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%

Snow

Snow
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison