18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Number of tests
1
18
13
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
6.1
6.2
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
Available sizes
15
47
530

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison