18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
1
18
3
15
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
6.1
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
47
34
122

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison