18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
1
18
23
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
Available sizes
15
47
188

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison