18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Goodyear
Cargo UltraGrip 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
2
10
Best position
#13
#5
#2
Average position
13.0
5.0
6.0
Latest test
2019
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
24
104

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
49%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Snow

Snow
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Ice

Ice
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison