18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
1
21
14
Best position
#13
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
11.9
5.6
Latest test
2019
2024
2023
Available sizes
15
164
47

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Nokian WetProof
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Nokian WetProof
69%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Nokian WetProof
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison