18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
21
13
1
Best position
#13
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
11.9
4.3
1.0
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
164
123
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison