18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
21
3
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
11.9
3.3
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
Available sizes
15
164
60

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison