18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
21
1
6
Best position
#13
#2
#1
#3
Average position
13.0
11.9
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
164
64
146

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison