18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
21
3
26
Best position
#13
#2
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
11.9
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
164
34
66

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison