Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

6

1

Best position

#13

#3

#1

Average position

13.0

4.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

146

64

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

ACTIVAN WINTER

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison