18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
6
5
1
Best position
#13
#3
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
4.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
146
63
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison