18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
6
2
Best position
#13
#3
#1
Average position
13.0
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
146
23

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison