18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

VS

Firestone Roadhawk 2

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Firestone (56%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

1

6

Best position

#13

#3

Average position

13.0

4.7

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

15

146

Wet

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Dry

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Comfort

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Costs

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison