18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Firestone (56%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
6
Best position
#13
#3
Average position
13.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
146

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison