18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Firestone Roadhawk

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Firestone (56%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
1
21
Best position
#13
#2
Average position
13.0
11.9
Latest test
2019
2024
Available sizes
15
164

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison