18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
EuroWinter VAN01
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
4
1
3
Best position
#13
#6
#3
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
6.0
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
32
111
64
34

Wet

Wet
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Snow

Snow
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
48%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Ice

Ice
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
86%

Costs

Costs
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison