Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Number of tests

1

Best position

#13

#6

#7

Average position

13.0

6.0

7.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

15

32

56

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

49%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Wet Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Wet Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Wet Circle Cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Aquaplaning Cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry Performance

82%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Dry Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Snow Performance

68%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Snow Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Snow Traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Snow Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Ice Performance

86%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Ice Braking Abs

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Ice Lateral Guidance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Comfort & Noise

66%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Noise Exterior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Noise Interior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Economy

90%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Fuel Efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

ACTIVAN WINTER

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison